just because every gunman is a loner
doesn’t mean every loner is a gunman
just because you have to have mental issues
to go off like that
doesn’t mean every person with mental issues will go off
and do you SEE what you are doing?
because i do
i see what you are after
working to isolate a type
to judge and condemn before any action
when some of the greatest thinkers in the world
some of the most creative minds
had their mental issues
guilty before proven innocent
i see what you are after
stop them! stop them! stop them!
round up the ones who might
and then do what?
make them like everybody else?
as a person who has never been like anybody else
i have to protest
these knee jerk reactions
the town is sick!
it is because of money and loans
power of banks
so let us round up all the jews…. for
that is where the sickness is
oh don’t stand on your high horse
full of what an awful
troubled loner would do….
when there are plenty of loners
that do not go on shooting rampages
there are plenty of the mentally ill that
do not fantasize about death
it’s a very basic mathematical principal
not mutually exclusive
so the only thing you gain
by saying, “well, he was a loner
and strange and troubled person”
is to be saying that of course
strange and troubled people are the problem
which is not true
every gunman might be strange and troubled
but not every strange and troubled person
is a gunman
get it straight
because not every perfectly adjusted person
is never a gunman
and the fact is i see what you are doing
but i say
you are the gunman
you are man on the street begging for coins
you are the person walking their dog
riding their bike
every person is you
every person is your creation
because you are part
of this world
so what does it take to be a gunman?
i really don’t care
i’ve never wanted to be one
what does it take to be an artist?
probably a lot of the same things it takes to be a gunman
what does it take to be a caring person?
to shake your head and say “how terrible. ”
what does it take to be a caring person with a brain?
i don’t care if he was a strange loner or the
captain of the football team
what he BECAME was a gunman
oh but the captain of the football team would not do such things!
no, he just joins the army
and shoots men in other countries
the way it’s supposed to be done
and just as dead
just as dead…..
a mathematical principal
not all soldiers are football captains
not all football captains are perfect
not all soldiers perfect football captains
do you know how big your problem is
to compute sets and subsets
as always being mutually exclusive?
i’m more angry at the bad math
than i am about the isolation
and persecution of specific groups
or the demonization
of specific personality traits
i’m more angry about the bad math
you know what i told the doctor
who said i had a personality disorder?
i told him, “you don’t like my personality?
well isn’t that too bad …. i don’t like you, either.”
you don’t like me,
i’m not here to be liked
in fact, i’m not sure why i’m here
but i know that it isn’t to
do everything exactly as expected
just to be liked
i mix it up
i see things like people
wanting to isolate traits
saying of course, that is why
when it is NOT why
do you have ANY concept of the probability
factors you would have to see
for that to be judged a casual factor?
if being a loner causes a boy to be a gunman
then what percentage of loners are gunmen?
for every one that goes on a shooting spree,
how many are there that do NOT?
and we are talking percentages so low
you might as well say every lemon is sweet
because the one i had today
was not a bit sour
eh….. it’s fact that a killer is a killer.
is the answer
that to make less killers
we must make less strange loners?
no….. because less strange loners
probably means less writers, less artists,
less geniuses, less scientists
….. less computer techs……. i could go on….
the path of intersecting sets and subsets
get it straight
understand that the only way to prevent
gunmen from mowing down
children in a school
is to shoot the gunman
which is exactly what we did
and the way to make it not become a pattern
is to determine what makes the pattern attractive
not determine what type is attracted to it
because the latter is the thinking of the bigot
and the former is the thinking of a problem solver
what makes shooting up a classroom attractive?
what makes postal workers shooting up their place of work
what makes that attractive?
what are the key factors?
because it’s not their fault
they are products of the system
did the post office system change?
you bet it did
you do realize that we could simply drug all the drinking
water to make docile citizens?
you do realize freedom comes with a price
what makes it attractive to bring a gun to school
and use it?
not what is wrong with the student
what makes them feel that’s the right thing to do?
just because it’s easier to say they had problems
does not solve the question
because every single one of their problems
are the same problems many others have
that do NOT kill, that are NOT attracted to shooting up a classroom
why is it attractive to shoot up a classroom?
work on that.
it might be as simple as each one has a giant clock
or might be from the seating arrangement
ducks in a row
it might be pressure of grades or
the fact that children can be cruel
but what is the change within school systems
what are the combined factors
like cellphones and more choices
less expectations? more expectations?
what are the counter-measures
what are the points to begin experimenting with change?
clamp down tighter on mental illness!
yea, that’s really going to be the answer
when many of the drugs remove inhibitions
and could potentially make things worse
look for warning signs!
again that is placing causality upon the object that is
effected, not the point of origin
why now? why are there school shootings?
kids aren’t getting enough sleep
kids got subjected to baby einstein
kids are getting worse nutrition because of gmo’s
take your pick.
but kids are loners, kids are angry teenagers
and mentally ill?
has always been so
what is the attraction to shooting up a school?
why do these gunmen feel the need to act that way?
why are gunmen attracted to shooting up the school
what attracted them to that action?
why is it that spot
not what is wrong with that gunman
what is wrong with him is that he was attracted to shooting up a school
we can’t change each individual before they are attracted
we can only change the thing that is attracting
it’s pull your heads out of the media (a$$) haze
that is only interested in creating a witch hunt
which guesss what?
creates more confusion and blaming
and guess who then covers that story, the media
do something about the system.
the fault is not the person.
they are all one of us….
we are them
it’s a problem that can and will be solved
but not by making people more suspicious
of each other
that just gives us a whole new set of problems down the road